Adding my Twitter Account info!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Days 82-86 – January 9-13

Before I even get started I want to say that I’m so excited because I received Tracy Zager’s book: Becoming The Math Teacher You Wish You’d Had in the mail yesterday! I can’t wait to start reading it. Go buy it if you haven’t already!!

Algebra 1 – We are continuing with sequences this week. I love this first problem the kids had to do (this was  2 day lesson):

“Samantha and her teacher have been busy creating new sequence generators and the sequences they produce. Below are the sequences Samantha and her teacher created.Your Task: Working together, organize the sequences into families of similar sequences. Your team will need to decide how many families to make, what common features make the sequences a family, and what characteristics make each family different from the others. Follow the directions below. As you work, use the following questions to help guide your team’s discussion.


a.  −4, −1, 2, 5, … b.  1.5, 3, 6, 12, …
c.  0, 1, 4, 9, … d.  2, 3.5, 5, 6.5, …
e. 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, … f.  9, 7, 5, 3, …
g.  48, 24, 12, … h.  27, 9, 3, 1, …
i.  8, 2, 0, 2, 8, 18, … j.  , 5, 10, …
How can we describe the pattern?  How does it grow?What do they have in common?
(1)  As a team, initially sort the sequence strips into groups based on your first glance at the sequences.  Remember that you can sort the sequences into more than two families.  You will have a chance to revise your groups throughout this activity, so just sort them in a way that makes sense to start out with.  Which seem to behave similarly?  Record your groupings and what they have in common before proceeding.
(2)  If one exists, find a sequence generator (growth pattern) for each sequence and write it on the strip. You can express the sequence generator either in symbols or in words. Also record the next three terms in each sequence on the strips. Do your sequence families still make sense? If so, what new information do you have about your sequence families? If not, reorganize the strips and egroupwork-alg-sequencesxplain how you decided to group them.(3)  Get a set of resource pages, saving a copy of each of the tables and graphs for your team. Then record each sequence in a table. Your table should compare the term number, n, to the value of each term, t(n). This means that your sequence itself is a list of outputs of the relationship and the inputs are a list of integers! The first term in a sequence is always n = 1. Attach the table to the sequence strip it represents. Do your sequence families still make sense? Record any new information or reorganize your sequence families if nece
(4) Now graph each sequence on a the graphs your teacher gave you. Include as many terms as will fit on the existing set of axes.  Be sure to decide whether your graphs should be discrete or continuous. Use color to show the growth between the points on each graph. Attach the graph to the sequence strip it represents. Does your sequence families still make sense? Record any new information and reorganize your sequence families if necessary.”
There was a lot of discussion on grouping, and some kids persevered on the rule and others had some troubles. We discussed the rules and I had students share how they figured out the harder ones. The next day they “learned the language” of sequences – arithmetic, geometric, sequence generator, common difference and were reminded of discrete vs continuous and domain.  It was also new to write the sequence as t(n) = 3n+4, and to understand that n is the term number, 1st, 2nd, 3rd. The next day was explicit equations vs. recursive equations. It’s the first time I’ve taught recursive equations as this didn’t used to be in algebra 1!  The kids didn’t see the point of it at first, why should they write an equation depending on the term before the current term if they could just write the rule? But…. a few days before we’d had the Fibonacci numbers in one of the sequences, so they remembered they couldn’t write a rule for it. However, they could write a recursive rule for it!  Another great CPM Algebra lesson. Today we had a quiz, that was all on review material (which is given daily in the homework). I told them if they don’t do well on the quiz it’s because they aren’t doing their homework very well (CPM has help for every problem, with hints, for free. Some check their work, some don’t…) I’ll grade the quizzes this weekend and see how they do!
Math 7 – We started our Probability Unit this week. We’re using the lessons from the 7th grade CPM book (CC2). If you buy a Black Line Master from CPM you can make as many copies of it as you like – so since I had one we could copy the lessons for the kids (it’s in ch 1 and ch 5). And, since the homework help is FREE, they can get help if we assign those problems…which we aren’t since we do the weekly hw page which is AWESOME.
We have worked on experimental vs. theoretical probability, we investigated probability by making a spinner and then having each student spin the spinner (bobby pin) 10 times. We totaled the spins by color and compared the class results to the theoretical results. Today we wrote about the difference between experimental vs. theoretical probability, and then calculated the theoretical probability for different things if it was possible.
“Look at the situations below and decide with your team if you can find a theoretical probability for each one.  If you decide that you can find the theoretical probability, then do so.

  1. Picking an Ace from a standard 52-card deck.
  2. Not rolling a 3 on a standard number cube.
  3. The chances of a thumbtack landing with its point up or on its side.
  4. Getting the one red crayon from a set of eight different-color crayons.
  5. The likelihood that you will run out of gas on a long car trip.”

Initially the kids said #2 was 1/6, then some said NO, it’s Not rolling a 3! so 5/6.

After that we worked on what would happen if we “modified the sample space”. They had a bag with different colored blocks in it and calculated the theoretical probability for drawing the different colors (naturally 1 bag was missing a green, and that was the group I called on for their first probability…. so it was 4/11 rather than 4/12… so i had to run across to where I’d left the box ‘o blocks to get another green!). Then I gave them another (identical) bag and they calculated the probabilities again. They were the same!

The initial questions in the lesson were “If you want to have the best chances of getting a red gumball from a gumball machine, is it better if the machine is full of gumballs or half empty?  How do the chances of getting an ace in a deck of playing cards change if you have three or four decks of cards to choose from instead of only one deck?  In this lesson, you will think about the size of the sample space (the collection of all possible outcomes of an event).”  We will talk about this again on Tuesday (Martin Luther King, Jr. day is Monday) because it’s natural to think that if there are more you have a better chance.  It was a fun start to the unit.


Math 7 Accelerated – We are finishing up chapter 4 in the CPM CC3 book so we were putting together the pattern, table, rule and graph. They graphed a line without an xy table. There was a lot of discussion on the “growth” (we haven’t said slope yet), and why if the pattern increases by 4 each time you graph that as up 4 and over 1. I wrote “change in y / change in x” then introduced it as delta y/delta x and we talked about and drew the “growth triangles”. It’s hard for me to remember to do the actual drawing “up and over”, I’m so used to just “counting” up and over. But I think it pushed the kids and that was good. Yesterday we went to the computer lab and the kids did Desmos’ Marble Slides-Lines. Last year we had done this at the beginning of the unit and the kids figured out “how” to make the lines move, but didn’t know “what” they were doing. This year it was better, but some were still not sure how to move the lines up and down. We’ll be doing a lot more with the lines, and I think we’ll go back and do Marble Slides again because most of the kids didn’t get to the “hard” ones.  It was a great way to review slope and y-intercepts though!  Today they had their group quiz. One of the problems gave them an equation then a tile pattern from a different equation. They needed to write the rule, draw 3 or 4 patterns, make a table and graph the line for each of the patterns, then tell me if they thought the 2 patterns would ever have the same number of tiles. Yep – we looked at it and said, “these are great!”  So last night I did the quiz – and looked at the answer key. The second pattern was triangular (okay) and decreased (okay), removing one layer, or column each time. So pattern 0 had 7 columns, with 7, then 6, then 5, then 4 etc. tiles per column. Pattern 1 had 6 columns.  I told them they needed to draw the pattern first – at least 3 more – then do the other representations. If they didn’t know how to write the rule they could describe what was happening. This is because the rule is [(x-8)(x-7)]/2.  Yep. I think I’m going to change the instructions to tell them to describe the rule because I like having them do this problem….but so many were starting in slope intercept form, with -28 as “b”, since pattern 0 had 28 tiles!  I’ll grade those this weekend too.

That was the week!


Posted in Graphing, Groupwork, Patterns | 1 Comment

Days 78 – 81, January 3-8, 2017

Algebra – We came back from our Winter Break (aka Christmas Vacation when I was in school) and started chapter 5 in the CPM Core Connections Algebra Book. It’s on Sequences and I’m looking forward to teaching it because it’s so different from the 1 section that would be on sequences in the old Algebra book I’ve used.

We started out by representing exponential growth by looking at bunnies reproducing. There were several different situations that we looked at, drew patterns for and graphed. Next came dropping a bouncy-ball from different heights and seeing what the rebound rate was (it was raining that day, so we had to go into the “Jungle Hallway” – see the pics). We calculated the “rebound ratio” and figured out that this was the slope of the line.

The next day we used the bouncy-balls again, except this time they caught the ball at the top of the rebound, recorded that height, then dropped it from there again. This graph was ball bounce to bounce height – and showed exponential decay! It was pretty cool.

Math 7 – We decided to finish up proportions and come back later to equations again. We (awesome co-teacher-Maddy and I) need to do more work with using inverse operations to solve equations that have fraction answers. Our kids are really good at “undoing” or “looking inside” the equations to find the answer when it’s an integer, but we want to work more on just “using inverse operations to solve the equation” so they have another resource when the equation isn’t as “nice”. So… we did big white board review of proportions – we gave the kids a situation and they had to write the proportion from it and solve it – and equations, and some area and perimeter. (We started reviewing area and perimeter in homework, so put a perimeter question on our test.) Wednesday we used Mr. Orr’s awesome post on a site he found “Internet in Real Time”. The link to the original site wasn’t working so I found another one that showed the numbers changing (go look at his post!), then froze it at one second. The kids made up problems on the white boards (if there are 214 tweets per second, how many tweets would there be in a day?) and then walked around the room looking at the different questions. Then I called on a few kids and they picked one of the problems and we all solved it – and explained how they solved it. I NEVER had to explain how to figure out how many seconds were in a day! They said 60 x 60 x 214 because there are 60 seconds in a minute and 60 minutes in an hour, then times that by 24 for the hours in a day. WooHoo!!  On Thursday we did some more proportion problems and then on Friday they took a team test. We started out by having the kids work in pairs, then they could check their results with the pair across from them. And, a lot didn’t finish, so they’ll finish today.

I think the reason they didn’t finish is because we are still discussing the homework everyday, but that is so great! This week one problem was to write a situation for 157 – 162 and the student that was explaining it said he lent his mom $157 and then spent $162  ( so -157 – 162) and got -319. Hands went up. He called on a student who said it wasn’t -157, just 157. The boy explaining said, “But you can’t take away 162 from 157, it doesn’t make since. You can’t spend more than you have.”  I said “What if you reversed the problem?” So then he wrote -162 + 157 and said, “Oh, it’s -5.”  I loved that 1) kids questioned his answer, and 2) he thought about it making sense when writing his story and 3) realized he could have reversed it. This is the best homework, and use of homework I have ever done.

Math 7 Accelerated – We also started a new chapter, Chapter 4 in the CPM Core Connections 3 book. It’s on patterns and equations, tables and situations, and tying them all together. The groups all had patterns that were all quadratic, and we were working on “seeing the pattern number in squares and rectangles in the patterns”. It was pretty cool seeing the different ways the kids “saw” the patterns. We spend a few days doing it – and used Fawn’s site for some extra examples. On Friday we started talking about y=mx+b and where the m and b are shown in the patterns.  It is so much fun watching the kids “see” the growth.

Posted in Graphing, Large White Boards, Ratios & Proportions | 1 Comment

Days 73 – 77 Dec 12-16, 2016

The last week of school before winter break!

Algebra CP – We finished chapter 4. The week started by choosing the best method to solve systems problems, and writing systems from word problems. We had the group quiz on Tuesday, then went over it and did some more review and had the test on Thursday. Friday the kids did some test corrections and then did the Stacking Cups Activity that Fawn wrote about. Some of the kids remembered it from last year – everyone got the equation really well, I think it was better here than in 7th Accelerated (note to self).

Math 7CP – I didn’t get to post some of the “If I Were One Inch Tall” poems my kids wrote, so I want to post them now…

This week we worked on writing proportions from word problems, writingultimate-tictactoe a little “word ratio” so it would be easier to see which numbers were representing which items. I still need to work more with them on why cross multiplying works – we did examples like 1/2 = 2/4 so they could cross multiply and see the results were the same, but I think next week I want do more with it – I think if we reduce them to the lowest terms it’s easier to see that we are multiplying the same things, so that’s why we get the same answers. We had a quiz on proportions this week and then on
Friday I had 2 different activities – Ultimate TicTacToe and Area Puzzles from a book I had bought (after seeing it on Twitter)…



Math 7 Accelerated – This week we had the chapter 3 group quiz, chapter 3 closure and the chapter 3 test. What a fun week! It was on equations so was really a review of the work we’d done at the beginning of the year, but there are still too many kids not thinking about what they’re doing and not distributing correctly or other errors. We’ll keep solving equations!  On Thursday we did Robert Kaplinsky’s In and Out Burger activity and I think they liked it. On Friday the kids worked together to do problems from the Area Puzzles book (see above) and these problems definitely get challenging!

This was a short post because 1) I’m writing it 2 weeks late so don’t remember some of the things we did, and 2) it was the week before the break so it was tests and quizzes before the break! I did like that I found puzzles and fun math activities for the last day, I didn’t want to “have a party and show a movie” this year. This is the end of 2016!


Posted in Ratios & Proportions, Systems of Equations | 3 Comments

Days 68-72, Dec. 5-9

Algebra 1 – We’ve been working on solving systems of eqsystems-problemuations using the elimination method for part of the week, then the lesson was on picking the most efficient way to solve a system based on the system. It was good because the kids had to say WHY they chose their method. On Thursday I gave the kids some puzzles I had saved. I really like the rectangle puzzle – but it was a little frustrating for period 2. They wanted to divide by 5. We talked about what the perimeter is of a rectangle, then labeled the sides with length or width. They got the first equation, then one group saw the second equation of comparing the sides and shared that with the class, so eventually everyone solved it.

The second problem was the problem with Ivan, Acrobats and Grandmas. It doesn’t need to be solved with systems, but it can be solved with systems. It’s just a fun problem.

Math 7 CP – We continued working on Barbie Proportions, calculating what Barbie’s measurements would be if she was the height of the person measured. Then we compared the person’s measurements to Barbie’s to see if Barbie would look “realistic” or not! It turns out her neck would be too long, and her feet would be too small – way too small! On Wednesday we went over the homework from Monday and Tuesday (the kids go up and explain how they did each problem and we need to make corrections sometimes but I think it’s totally worth it) and then I read them the poem “If You Were One Inch Tall” by Shel Silverstein. Their assignment was to write a similar poem, but using a different measurement with similar comparisons. Finishing the poem was their homework for 2 nights, I collected it today (Monday). On Thursday we did Double Clothesline Math by Andrew Stadel & Chris Shore. The kids worked on the questions then we talked about the different ways they solved them. We did several problems – I think it worked really well. On Friday I was out of town at a memorial for my Aunt in Virginia and the kids worked on solving proportions – they had to tell me if they used a relationship or cross-multiplied to solve them, and what the relationship was. Hopefully it made them think a little and not just be a robot!

Math 7 Accelerated – This was the final week of chapter 3, solving equations. I really wish we hadn’t done that big equations unit at the beginning of the year – it was really hard and this chapter was on equations…and it was well done and had great mixed practice homework so we didn’t want to skip it!  Next year we’ll change it to just starting with this book I think.

The class worked on figuring out how many solutions the equation would have, and wrote equations to solve problems. On Friday they did a review on showing an problem as a graph, tile pattern, table and the equation. Today I walked around and looked at their graphs – too many kids need to remember to use a ruler, use the space accurately – when should they make a 1 quadrant vs 4 quadrant graph, and to label!


Posted in Area & Perimeter, Ratios & Proportions, Systems of Equations | 3 Comments

Days 63-67, Nov 28 – Dec 2

I have 15 minutes so this will not be very thorough!

Algebra CP – We are working on Systems of Equations, we just started chapter 4. It starts with the “Equal Values” method, which the students also did in 8th grade  (assuming they had 8th grade math, and not Boost Camp). This is when the equations are both in slope intercept form and you just set them equal to each other since the “y’s” are equal.  Then we saw how it’s not always efficient to put the equations into slope intercept form, you get fractions for M and B, so another method is solving by substitution.  We were also writing the 2 equations from a situation. Today we put it all together – wrote the equations from the situation (yodelers with xylophones on a gondola…)and solved them, then graphed the lines – hey! they cross at the same solution, then made tables from the equations and saw that they both contained the same points! The kids worked on the white boards on the walls one day solving the systems.

Math 7CP – We are starting a new unit – proportions and more equations. We started the week with a Desmos Activity – Marcellus the Giant – to introduce proportions. Then we created Ratio Tables from examples in the book Building Powerful Numeracy for Middle and High School Students, which I think worked pretty well. I need to do more though!  Then we wrote proportions from “If the World was 100 People” – we made a worksheet from this YouTube video.  I want the kids to write one on their own at the end of the period, and a lot picked 30 would have the internet, 70 would not.  Then they wrote the proportion as 30/70 = …. I’m going around saying “is the world 70 people?”  Yeah, need more work on those! We ended the week doing Barbie Proportions – but it was too soon in retrospect. We need to work on solving equations by cross multiplying first, and how to logically set up a proportion more before we do this.  I’ll try and put all of the material for it in next week’s blog.

Math 7 Accelerated – We are continuing with chapter 3, and spent the beginning of the week looking at graphs and deciding what made a complete graph – labels, title, proper increments, lines with arrows and also looked at graphs and found the common errors. Then we reviewed some and took a quiz on chapter 3 that had “the silent board game” in it as well as equations, simplifying expressions and “graphing, tables, rules” – I gave them one and they had to do the other 2.  For homework after the quiz they had do solve 10 equations that had distributive property, combining like terms, etc.  This should be TOTAL REVIEW since we’ve been doing equations since September.  It was amazing to me how many kids were saying “I didn’t get that” and I’d start the problem with them and they’d have messed up on distributing, negatives, written the problem wrong.  I haven’t finished correcting the test – hopefully those equations are better!  Today we worked on solving equations and checking with the formal check – showing the substitution of the value for the variable and showing the equation is equal.

I’m also getting Maddy and Karen signed up for Jo Boaler’s Mathematical Mindsets conference at Stanford…in my spare time. I think it will be amazing, but getting the check from the district (Stanford won’t take a PO) is a ton of paperwork.  Fingers crossed that we’ll get them registered before the session is full!

Posted in Conferences | Leave a comment

Days 58-62, November 14-18

This year (and apparently this year only) we have a week off for Thanksgiving. And this is the week before that week, it’s the end of Trimester 1, and the kids are READY to be out of school. So of course EVERYONE is giving tests this week! Lucky kids.

Algebra 1 – Monday we had the Group Quiz – which was too easy I think. I had looked it over, but didn’t do it (why won’t I learn??), and then when I did the key I thought it was too easy. But, that means all of the  grades were good! We did the closure problems on Tuesday, and the kids had the option of doing them on the large white boards, then whatever they didn’t finish in class was homework, to be done in their spirals. Most of the kids did them on the whiteboards, and I walked around. I liked it a lot because they could pick how they wanted to work – sitting or standing, alone or with a partner. It went really well. Wednesday we went over some of the closure problems that they wanted more help with – a LOT of exponent work. Thursday they had their chapter 3 test (which I haven’t looked at yet so have no idea how they did) and today we worked on graphing parallel and perpendicular lines. The kids that had Math 7 Accelerated (had the 8th grade standards already) remembered they’d done it before so they could help the kids that just took Boost Camp and got to be in Algebra instead of Math 8CP. I collected the papers as One More Grade.

Math 7CP – We were finishing up our equations unit – we aren’t done with equations, but we really worked on ones that they could figure out “by thinking about it”. I was a little sad yesterday when the kids took their test and one of my kids had no idea what to do to solve the equations – I’m going to ask him if he can stay after school on Wednesdays and work with me for 1/2 an hour. He needs some 1 on 1 time I think. We will do more equations that have division in them, and ones that have fraction answers next trimester. So Monday and Tuesday we did more work with equations, and Wednesday we reviewed. Maddy (my awesome fellow teacher) had made a list of the topics that would be on the test (study guide for her website, I don’t put one up) and assigned each table one of the items to create a problem on that topic. After we had gone over the homework (That is working SO well. I’m still assigning the problems to the different tables and then a student from the table goes up and presents how they solved the problem, they answer questions from the class, then they “get a clap on 3”. This is another thing I got from Maddy – she does hers on white boards and I used the document camera, but it’s really working well – I think one of the reasons is all of the problems are on different topics so it’s not 12 of the same thing!) I assigned (yes, I’m still on the original sentence) each table one or two of the topics and had them work together to make up a question. Then with about 10 minutes left each table sent up one person to write down their problem in my spiral – and these problems were the homework for the test review. (there were 8).equation-test-review

I collected them on Thursday before the test, after we went over the correct answers. Thursday we had the Equations Unit Test, and today we are going to go over the homework (Wednesday’s since I hadn’t planned on the Awesome Review Homework), then play MATHO (yep, Bingo but to get the number they have to do a math problem-the link is for the book). The book is cool because it has a bunch of games with the problems already made, and the problem number is the answer.

Math 7 Accelerated – We decided to give the Math 7 Accelerated Benchmark to our classes even though we are using supplemental material (CPM). There were 3 questions we changed because they were on inequalities which we haven’t done yet. So, we worked on chapter 3 – completing tables, drawing graphs, finding the equations for the tables for Monday and Tuesday, then reviewed on Wednesday. We talked about a few things that they hadn’t done but could figure out – consecutive integers, how to write an inequality from a situation (which I’m pretty sure they did in 6th grade) such as “you must be at least 16 years old to get your drivers license” and a few other things, then I put up the list of topics and assigned each group a topic. They had about 4 minutes to work in their groups, then they read the question aloud and I wrote them down (we didn’t have as much time as Math 7CP did) and these questions were their homework. Number 5 below is 1) not a good question because it doesn’t work out to whole cookies, so that group didn’t do the problem and 2) has shown to be really hard for the kids because my TA is checking their problems and they’re not doing it correctly. So, we’ll be doing a lot more of these problems!


Thursday they did a short performance task and started the Benchmark (most of them) and today they finished the Benchmark and worked on a KenKen (did you know you can subscribe to KenKen and get puzzles emailed to you each week? They had a choice of a “no-op 7×7 puzzle” or “twist 6×6 puzzle”) or a HUGE dot to dot puzzle.

I’m definitely looking forward to next week – even though I have a lot of tests and work to grade! Happy Thanksgiving!


Posted in Equations, Review | Leave a comment